Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Changing RC failsafe

[Felix Ruess]

Hi,

as you probably tried to do you can use an exception in your flight plan if you really need to react to RC loss while it is actually flying autonomously and RC is not really required anymore...
For that you need to include a header file in your flightplan so you can check RCLost():

<header>

#include "inter_mcu.h"

</header>

Cheers, Felix

On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:30 AM, paparazzi_guy <address@hidden> wrote:

I tried using RCLost() in my flight plan but it is telling me that
RADIO_REALLY_LOST is undeclared. I looked through the github Paparazzi files
but I can't find any examples of where this is implemented. This value is
defined in the header file inter_mcu.h and I tried adding that but it didn't
work either.

Also, when looking at the website Paparazzi UAS where it defines varies
functions, it only says:

#define RCLost()   bit_is_set(fbw_state->status, RADIO_REALLY_LOST)

Maybe I should give RADIO_REALLY_LOST some random value and see what
happens.




--
View this message in context: http://lists.paparazziuav.org/Changing-RC-failsafe-tp15065p15071.html

Sent from the paparazzi-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
Paparazzi-devel mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel