paparazzi-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Paparazzi-devel] relation between nps and real flight


From: Stephen Dwyer
Subject: Re: [Paparazzi-devel] relation between nps and real flight
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 16:43:00 -0600

Hello,

The fdm (flight dynamics model) is not needed in real life - only for the simulation target. Currently the only option for this is jsbsim anyways.

For the airframe, "Quadrotor LisaM_2.0 pwm" should technically probably work, but the gains and other settings will have be adjusted to your hardware and airframe setup... (I can't guarantee that though, maybe someone with more experience knows differently).

Thanks,
-Stephen Dwyer




On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 2:31 AM, evan igor <address@hidden> wrote:
Hi,
in case of real flight airborne what will be the fdm.


On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 9:41 AM, evan igor <address@hidden> wrote:
or the question in another form in the airframe of "Quadrotor LisaM_2.0 pwm"
i have 2 questions :
1- is this airframe and its guidance and telemetry files could upload to liza/m and make a real flight for quadcopter.
2- if not what is the benefit of the lines of 
&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
 <target name="nps" board="pc">
      <subsystem name="fdm" type="jsbsim"/>
      <subsystem name="radio_control" type="ppm"/>
    </target>
&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
thanks for all


On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 4:14 PM, evan igor <address@hidden> wrote:
Hi, thanks for reply 

then there is no appearance for these lines in the real airborne for real flight

thanks



_______________________________________________
Paparazzi-devel mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]