Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Updated Images of Control Loops

[Chris Wozny]

Bart,

That would be great as we are also looking to use your fork for a
Mini-Vertigo. You can share the docs with this email address.w

Thanks,
Chris

On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 2:51 PM, Bart Remes <address@hidden> wrote:
> We (@tu delft) made a part of the control diagrams on google docs.
> I can share them with you if you like than you can adapt them and put them
> on the wiki.
>
> Bart Remes
>
>
> On Sunday, February 19, 2012, Felix Ruess wrote:
>>
>> Just a quick not regarding the signs for the control gains:
>> In the 4.0_beta branch, all the control gains are positive!
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 8:57 PM, Chris Wozny <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks Stephen,
>>>
>>> I just wanted to make sure that there were no updated images before I
>>> dug into the stabilization code :) One of my goals is to update the
>>> wiki for future Lisa/M users (and Paparazzi users if the topic is
>>> general enough) so I will add the block diagrams for the adaptive/new
>>> code at some point.
>>>
>>> - Chris
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Stephen Dwyer <address@hidden>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Hello,
>>> >
>>> > I don't think there are images anywhere for newer control schemes, but
>>> > it shouldn't be too hard to make some! Code seems readable enough, and
>>> > it would add nicely to the wiki page. The .dia files for the existing
>>> > loops are in doc/control_loops to keep things consistent.
>>> >
>>> > (Probably not the answer you were looking for...sorry!)
>>> >
>>> > Thanks,
>>> > -Stephen
>>> >
>>> > On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Chris Wozny <address@hidden>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >> Balazs,
>>> >>
>>> >> I have indeed seen those pages, however, the "new" and "adaptive"
>>> >> control
>>> >> schemes have far more gains than are depicted in those images.
>>> >>
>>> >> - Chris
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Wednesday, February 15, 2012,  <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> >>> Dear Chris,
>>> >>>
>>> >>> did you read the following page?:
>>> >>> http://paparazzi.enac.fr/wiki/Control_Loops
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Balazs
>>> >>>
>>> >>>> All,
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Is there an updated group of images for the control loops being used
>>> >>>> on
>>> >>>> the
>>> >>>> dev branch? I'm trying to pinpoint which gain(s) affect the distance
>>> >>>> for
>>> >>>> servo travel from IMU stimulation (read: shaking the aircraft) and
>>> >>>> from
>>> >>>> RC
>>> >>>> input in AUTO1 since it is extremely low in both. I get full range
>>> >>>> in
>>> >>>> MANUAL and the deflection is correct in pitch and roll. I also reset
>>> >>>> the
>>> >>>> aircraft on my T7CAP just to make sure no mixing was involved.
>>> >>>> Whether I
>>> >>>> change my AHRS type or control type, this problem still shows up.
>>> >>>> The PFD
>>> >>>> is showing correct motion when I roll and pitch Lisa/M 1.0 with
>>> >>>> Aspirin
>>> >>>> IMU
>>> >>>> v1.0. I've also followed the tuning procedures on the wiki to no
>>> >>>> avail.
>>> >>>> I'm
>>> >>>> testing with no motor connected to my ESC if that has any bearing
>>> >>>> (and I
>>> >>>> think it might since I believe throttle is taken into account when
>>> >>>> calculating servo deflection for roll/pitch.) Here are the links to
>>> >>>> the
>>> >>>> corresponding configurations:
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> http://ece.arizona.edu/~cwozny/mini_vertigo_az.xml
>>> >>>> http://ece.arizona.edu/~cwozny/T7cap.xml
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Also, is there no yaw correction from gyro deflection in the yaw
>>> >>>> axis in
>>> >>>> AUTO1/2?
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> - Chris
>>> >>>> _______________________________________________
>>> >>>> Paparazzi-devel mailing list
>>> >>>> address@hidden
>>> >>>> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel