Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Updated Images of Control Loops

[Chris Wozny]

Balazs,

I have indeed seen those pages, however, the "new" and "adaptive" control schemes have far more gains than are depicted in those images.

- Chris

On Wednesday, February 15, 2012,  <address@hidden> wrote:
> Dear Chris,
>
> did you read the following page?:
> http://paparazzi.enac.fr/wiki/Control_Loops
>
> Balazs
>
>> All,
>>
>> Is there an updated group of images for the control loops being used on
>> the
>> dev branch? I'm trying to pinpoint which gain(s) affect the distance for
>> servo travel from IMU stimulation (read: shaking the aircraft) and from RC
>> input in AUTO1 since it is extremely low in both. I get full range in
>> MANUAL and the deflection is correct in pitch and roll. I also reset the
>> aircraft on my T7CAP just to make sure no mixing was involved. Whether I
>> change my AHRS type or control type, this problem still shows up. The PFD
>> is showing correct motion when I roll and pitch Lisa/M 1.0 with Aspirin
>> IMU
>> v1.0. I've also followed the tuning procedures on the wiki to no avail.
>> I'm
>> testing with no motor connected to my ESC if that has any bearing (and I
>> think it might since I believe throttle is taken into account when
>> calculating servo deflection for roll/pitch.) Here are the links to the
>> corresponding configurations:
>>
>> http://ece.arizona.edu/~cwozny/mini_vertigo_az.xml
>> http://ece.arizona.edu/~cwozny/T7cap.xml
>>
>> Also, is there no yaw correction from gyro deflection in the yaw axis in
>> AUTO1/2?
>>
>> - Chris
>> _______________________________________________
>> Paparazzi-devel mailing list
>> address@hidden
>> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel
>>
>
>
>

-- 
Chris Wozny
ASUA Safe Ride
Administrative Director
Email: address@hidden
Office: 520-621-7233
Cell: 617-921-5679