Re: package maintainers please choose a package group

[Carlo De Falco]

> On 15 Mar 2017, at 17:13, Olaf Till <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> For mpi, sorry, but considering the history and the importance of this
> package I object to making it external. If someone in addition to you
> disagrees with me we should vote, and I'll detail my objections.
> 

I just prepared a new release that contains essentially a complete rewrite of 
the main functions in the package.
If MPI is remaining in community section my "external" release is then to be 
considered a fork.
According to your rules, should I change the name of the package?

c.