[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: globally installed packages vs. relocatable Octave
From: |
Juan Pablo Carbajal |
Subject: |
Re: globally installed packages vs. relocatable Octave |
Date: |
Fri, 7 Nov 2014 22:48:26 +0100 |
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 10:24 PM, John W. Eaton <address@hidden> wrote:
> I guess there will now be some work to merge the two versions because there
> have probably been changes in core Octave that are independent of the forked
> version of pkg.m.
What would be the best way to test this? Shall I clone the repo and
replace pkg.m and see if it works?
The changes where in pkg.m where local.
- globally installed packages vs. relocatable Octave, John W. Eaton, 2014/11/06
- Re: globally installed packages vs. relocatable Octave, Ben Abbott, 2014/11/06
- Re: globally installed packages vs. relocatable Octave, c., 2014/11/07
- Re: globally installed packages vs. relocatable Octave, Philip Nienhuis, 2014/11/07
- Re: globally installed packages vs. relocatable Octave, Carnë Draug, 2014/11/09