On 6 Nov 2014, at 22:59, Juan Pablo Carbajal <address@hidden> wrote:
Are we porting pkg.m form here [1] to core? I will be wiling to help
if that is the case.
[1]
https://bitbucket.org/carandraug/octave/branch/default?head=d670ed4e5ae64541056dec352af0901270a381c9
This pkg.m is more modular than the current version.
Juan Pablo,
I haven't looked at the code in your repository
for a long time but I remeber that it was definitely
much more readable and easy to maintain than the
current version of pkg.m
On the other hand I vaguely recall there were quite a few
missing features with respect to the current version.
I don't remember what those missing features were though,
do you?
Could you make a list of what you think it would take
to make the new pkg.m a viable replacement for the current
one and how much time it would take to do so?