Re: Matlab-style code in test/classes

[Ben Abbott]

On Jan 30, 2013, at 9:16 AM, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:

> On 30 January 2013 02:59, Julien Bect <address@hidden> wrote:
>> In my humble opinion: it's better if it stays, if you want to maintain
>> compatibility in the long run, when both Octave and Matlab will keep on
>> evolving.
> 
> "Compatibility" is a fuzzy concept. If it means rewriting Octave code
> to make sure it runs in Matlab, I don't want anything to do with it.
> To me, "comptability" just means the other way around: if it runs in
> Matlab, it should run in Octave.
> 
> - Jordi G. H.

I dont' think there is any objection for adding tests that only run in Octave.  
But I do like the idea of having/keeping tests for compatibility (if it runs in 
Matlab, it should run in Octave).

Ben