[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Sparse + complex arithmetic inconsistency
From: |
David Bateman |
Subject: |
Re: Sparse + complex arithmetic inconsistency |
Date: |
Sat, 31 Mar 2007 17:15:02 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060921) |
Paul Kienzle wrote:
>
> On Mar 31, 2007, at 2:54 PM, John W. Eaton wrote:
>
>> I seem to recall this problem [complex division and NaN]
>> coming up before, and we may have even discussed it on the
>> bug or maintainers list (the topic just seems familiar; I
>> haven't tried to find the thread in the archives).
>
> I spent some time looking for it, but I couldn't find it.
>
> In particular, my email included links to the C++ standards
> group discussion on the topic of complex arithmetic and a
> pointer to the reference implementation. I don't recall
> the details, but I do remember being surprised by the
> implementation.
>
> Can anyone point us to a copy of the C++ standards, since
> I can't find that link again either.
>
> Thanks,
>
> - Paul
>
>
For C99, try
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/standards
and in particular the annex F8. for C++ try
http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/standards
Cheers
David
- Re: Sparse + complex arithmetic inconsistency, (continued)
- Re: Sparse + complex arithmetic inconsistency, David Bateman, 2007/03/30
- Re: Sparse + complex arithmetic inconsistency, Michael Goffioul, 2007/03/30
- Re: Sparse + complex arithmetic inconsistency, David Bateman, 2007/03/30
- Re: Sparse + complex arithmetic inconsistency, Rafael Laboissiere, 2007/03/30
- Re: Sparse + complex arithmetic inconsistency, Michael Goffioul, 2007/03/30
- Re: Sparse + complex arithmetic inconsistency, Rafael Laboissiere, 2007/03/30
- Re: Sparse + complex arithmetic inconsistency, John W. Eaton, 2007/03/31
- Re: Sparse + complex arithmetic inconsistency, David Bateman, 2007/03/31
- Re: Sparse + complex arithmetic inconsistency, Rafael Laboissiere, 2007/03/31
- Re: Sparse + complex arithmetic inconsistency, Paul Kienzle, 2007/03/31
- Re: Sparse + complex arithmetic inconsistency,
David Bateman <=