[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Sparse + complex arithmetic inconsistency
From: |
Rafael Laboissiere |
Subject: |
Re: Sparse + complex arithmetic inconsistency |
Date: |
Fri, 30 Mar 2007 17:43:53 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
* Michael Goffioul <address@hidden> [2007-03-30 16:31]:
> The fact is that in current C++ implementations, these 2 methods
> return different results when the second argument is 0 (0+0i in the
> second case). IMO, it's more a implementation problem in standard
> C++ libraries, than a problem in Octave.
Yes, you are right.
--
Rafael
- Re: [Pkg-octave-devel] Re: Debian packages for Octave 2.9.10 available in experimental, (continued)
- Re: [Pkg-octave-devel] Re: Debian packages for Octave 2.9.10 available in experimental, David Bateman, 2007/03/29
- Re: [Pkg-octave-devel] Re: Debian packages for Octave 2.9.10 available in experimental, Rafael Laboissiere, 2007/03/30
- Re: [Pkg-octave-devel] Re: Debian packages for Octave 2.9.10 available in experimental, David Bateman, 2007/03/30
- Sparse + complex arithmetic inconsistency, Rafael Laboissiere, 2007/03/30
- Re: Sparse + complex arithmetic inconsistency, David Bateman, 2007/03/30
- Re: Sparse + complex arithmetic inconsistency, David Bateman, 2007/03/30
- Re: Sparse + complex arithmetic inconsistency, Michael Goffioul, 2007/03/30
- Re: Sparse + complex arithmetic inconsistency, David Bateman, 2007/03/30
- Re: Sparse + complex arithmetic inconsistency, Rafael Laboissiere, 2007/03/30
- Re: Sparse + complex arithmetic inconsistency, Michael Goffioul, 2007/03/30
- Re: Sparse + complex arithmetic inconsistency,
Rafael Laboissiere <=
- Re: Sparse + complex arithmetic inconsistency, John W. Eaton, 2007/03/31
- Re: Sparse + complex arithmetic inconsistency, David Bateman, 2007/03/31
- Re: Sparse + complex arithmetic inconsistency, Rafael Laboissiere, 2007/03/31
- Re: Sparse + complex arithmetic inconsistency, Paul Kienzle, 2007/03/31
- Re: Sparse + complex arithmetic inconsistency, David Bateman, 2007/03/31