[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 2.9.10, finally?
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: 2.9.10, finally? |
Date: |
Wed, 7 Feb 2007 18:59:35 -0500 |
On 7-Feb-2007, Daniel J Sebald wrote:
| Means of controlling myriad options for terminals?
Whatever is available as options to the print command. But if you use
gnuplot-specific options, then you are tying your code to gnuplot, and
that will likely break in the future.
| Otherwise, looking forward to seeing what is new. (CVS version is
| the stamp candidate, right?)
Yes.
| Well, the __gnuplot_raw__ is something I wish would be retained. (I
| thought it actually was meant to be some generic originally, like
| "__graphics_raw__".) It allows accessing features and terminal
| settings that Octave may not have reason to implement, e.g.,
| building animations using a series of plots. Its a helpful routine.
If you are using __gnuplot_raw__ only, then you might as well be using
plot_stream = popen ("gnuplot", "w");
fprintf (plot_stream, ...);
...
pclose (plot_stream);
jwe
- 2.9.10, finally?, John W. Eaton, 2007/02/07
- Re: 2.9.10, finally?, Daniel J Sebald, 2007/02/07
- Re: 2.9.10, finally?,
John W. Eaton <=
- Re: 2.9.10, finally?, Daniel J Sebald, 2007/02/07
- Re: 2.9.10, finally?, John W. Eaton, 2007/02/07
- Re: 2.9.10, finally?, Daniel J Sebald, 2007/02/07
- Re: 2.9.10, finally?, John W. Eaton, 2007/02/07
- Re: 2.9.10, finally?, Daniel J Sebald, 2007/02/07
- Re: 2.9.10, finally?, John W. Eaton, 2007/02/07
- Re: 2.9.10, finally?, Daniel J Sebald, 2007/02/07
- Re: 2.9.10, finally?, John W. Eaton, 2007/02/07
- Re: 2.9.10, finally?, Daniel J Sebald, 2007/02/08
- Re: 2.9.10, finally?, Shai Ayal, 2007/02/08