[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #60493] ignore_function_time_stamp none has no effect

[Tasos Papastylianou]

Follow-up Comment #14, bug #60493 (project octave):

Dear Rik and Mike, sorry for the delay in responding to this ticket.

The documentation change is useful and welcome, and I can confirm that I can
reproduce Mike's steps on my machine at this point in time, running octave
6.4.0.

I am happy that this ticket is resolved to my satisfaction within the scope of
the original submission and the example I provided.

But.

Having said that, the original issue that prompted me to open this ticket (see
[1] in the original submission, namely:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67334895/access-private-functions-from-private-functions-in-octave-bug)
persists, and it is true in that particular instance the
ignore_function_time_stamp function does not resolve the issue, even though a
manual edit has been performed, and that the problem persists until a manual
"clear functions" has been issued.

Presumably this means I misrepresented the original issue, for which I can
only apologise, and that a bug affecting ignore_function_time_stamp still
persists, which is unrelated to whether a return to the interactive prompt has
taken place or not.

If you prefer, I'm happy for this issue to be closed and a new one opened
representing the bug shown in the more elaborate example in [1].

Again, apologies for the trouble my unfortunate choice of example has caused.

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?60493>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via Savannah
  https://savannah.gnu.org/