[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #59022] [octave forge] (image) test failures in blockproc.m under Octave 6.0.90

[Hartmut]

Follow-up Comment #1, bug #59022 (project octave):

In line 102 of blockproc.m we check the following:


  if(!isa(fun,"function_handle") &&
     !isa(fun,"inline function") &&
     !ischar(fun))
    error("blockproc: invalid fun parameter.");
  endif


But the class name seems to have changed from "inline function" to "inline" in
Octave 6. At least I see this (in Octave 6):


>> a = inline("sum(x)","x")
a =

  <class inline>

>> class(a)
ans = inline


Is this an intentional name change in Octave 6? Shall we just change the above
code line 102 in blockproc.m to check for the new class name "inline" instead
of "inline function"?

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?59022>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via Savannah
  https://savannah.gnu.org/