[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #57584] spurious test "FAIL"s when running tes
From: |
Hartmut |
Subject: |
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #57584] spurious test "FAIL"s when running test suite in Octave with "--traditional" startup parameter |
Date: |
Sun, 12 Jan 2020 15:24:24 -0500 (EST) |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:72.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/72.0 |
URL:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?57584>
Summary: spurious test "FAIL"s when running test suite in
Octave with "--traditional" startup parameter
Project: GNU Octave
Submitted by: hardy
Submitted on: Sun 12 Jan 2020 08:24:22 PM UTC
Category: Test Suite
Severity: 3 - Normal
Priority: 5 - Normal
Item Group: None
Status: None
Assigned to: None
Originator Name:
Originator Email:
Open/Closed: Open
Discussion Lock: Any
Release: dev
Operating System: Any
_______________________________________________________
Details:
I have observed this with a self compiled current dev Octave under linux. I
don't think it's a big problem, but will report it here anyways.
Here is how to reproduce it:
* start Octave (gui or cli) with the startup option "--traditional"
* run the full test suit via run_test_suite (wait a bit...)
* at the end it reports many FAILs of tests, 91 FAILS in my case.
* search the text output of run_test_suite inside the console to pick one
function with a FAIL, e.g. hgsave.m or copyobj.m.
* manually run the tests of this function, e.g. "test hgsave.m" to see that
there are actualla NO test failures.
* have a look in fntests.log. There are also NO real test failures noted.
My conclusion is that the "problem" is somewhere in the routine of
run_test_suite itself, since all tests I run manually eventually passed.
I don't know if this is a "legal" use case of run_test_suite at all. But it
makes it hard to evaluate if some real tests fail when using this startup
option. (I wanted to check this, because of the now solved bug #57528.)
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?57584>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #57584] spurious test "FAIL"s when running test suite in Octave with "--traditional" startup parameter,
Hartmut <=
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #57584] spurious test "FAIL"s when running test suite in Octave with "--traditional" startup parameter, Mike Miller, 2020/01/12
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #57584] spurious test "FAIL"s when running test suite in Octave with "--traditional" startup parameter, Hartmut, 2020/01/12
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #57584] spurious test "FAIL"s when running test suite in Octave with "--traditional" startup parameter, Mike Miller, 2020/01/12
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #57584] spurious test "FAIL"s when running test suite in Octave with "--traditional" startup parameter, Mike Miller, 2020/01/12
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #57584] spurious test "FAIL"s when running test suite in Octave with "--traditional" startup parameter, Hartmut, 2020/01/13
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #57584] spurious test "FAIL"s when running test suite in Octave with "--traditional" startup parameter, Mike Miller, 2020/01/13
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #57584] spurious test "FAIL"s when running test suite in Octave with "--traditional" startup parameter, Hartmut, 2020/01/13
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #57584] spurious test "FAIL"s when running test suite in Octave with "--traditional" startup parameter, Markus Mützel, 2020/01/14
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #57584] spurious test "FAIL"s when running test suite in Octave with "--traditional" startup parameter, Hartmut, 2020/01/15
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #57584] spurious test "FAIL"s when running test suite in Octave with "--traditional" startup parameter, Mike Miller, 2020/01/15