[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] Future of monotone
From: |
Sebastian |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] Future of monotone |
Date: |
Mon, 28 Jan 2008 23:42:10 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070728) |
Markus Schiltknecht schrieb:
>
> While this list of *lacking* features is very appreciated, I feel it's
> also important to point out where monotone is shining.
>
> What comes to my mind:
>
> - very strong integrity checking
> - compiled C++ code, not interpreted
> - pretty thought-through and flexible certification concept (IMO)
> - database backend (SQL compliance)
> - dedicated multi-branch netsync protocol
> - ease of extensibility by lua hooks
>
> I'm sure there's much more...
...like
- just put a mtn binary in your $PATH and use your online-Repo over
ssh (couldn't find any other RCS doing this).
There are drawbacks on all the others too. I like monotone the best.
[Monotone-devel] Re: Future of monotone, Graydon Hoare, 2008/01/29
Re: [Monotone-devel] Future of monotone, Ulf Ochsenfahrt, 2008/01/28
Re: [Monotone-devel] Future of monotone, Markus Schiltknecht, 2008/01/28
Re: [Monotone-devel] Future of monotone, hendrik, 2008/01/29
Re: [Monotone-devel] Future of monotone, Ludovic Brenta, 2008/01/29
Re: [Monotone-devel] Future of monotone, Ethan Blanton, 2008/01/28
Re: [Monotone-devel] Future of monotone, Jack Lloyd, 2008/01/28