[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Performing an action only after X failures

From: Jan-Henrik Haukeland
Subject: Re: Performing an action only after X failures
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 00:04:08 +0100

On Dec 26, 2004, at 21:26, Martin Pala wrote:

In the case that it will be general, it can allow to stack the rules and provide error level dependant actions, such as for example:
 # if <X> <EVENT> within <Y> cycles then <ACTION>

... <X>   = number of event occurences
... <EVENT>       = event type
... <Y>   = number of consequent cycles
... <ACTION>      = given action (alert|restart|unmonitor|exec|...)

I'm +1 to add such feature. What do developers and users think about it?

I'm +1. If implemented then I think we can remove the every-statement?

Jan-Henrik Haukeland

Jan-Henrik Haukeland
Mobil +47 97141255

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]