mingw-cross-env-list
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Mingw-cross-env-list] Proposal for new guidelines


From: Volker Grabsch
Subject: Re: [Mingw-cross-env-list] Proposal for new guidelines
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 15:06:35 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)

Tony Theodore <address@hidden> schrieb:
> Automake (and autoconf) are versioned packages on FreeBSD (with their
> own wrapper scipts to create unversioned links). The new required
> package names are:
> 
> pkg_add -r automake110 bash bison cmake gmake gsed \
>            libtool openssl pkg-config scons unzip wget
> 
> automake depends on both perl and autoconf, and flex is in the base
> system, so we can leave them out.

Okay, I changed the docs accordingly.

However, are you sure it is a good idea to provide a minimal
set of packages, rather than an explicit list that can be
mechanically checked against the list (table) of requirements?

Also, will the dependencies always stay the same? Will flex
always be considered as "base" package by FreeBSD?

For instance, I could shorten the package list for Debian, too,
but I'm somewhat unsure whether this would be really a good idea.


Greets,

    Volker

-- 
Volker Grabsch
---<<(())>>---
Administrator
NotJustHosting GbR




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]