[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev Revised patch for HTFTP.c
From: |
Philip Webb |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev Revised patch for HTFTP.c |
Date: |
Sat, 19 Aug 2000 14:26:35 -0400 |
000819 Thomas Dickey wrote:
>> FYI - the ipv6 patch that went into dev7 will run the detection routines,
>> but does not define INET6 to enable it.
> it is supposed to do this in lynx_cfg.h
>
> #define ENABLE_IPV6 1
^^^^
>
> which feeds into this in www_tcp.h:
>
> /* IPv6 support */
> #if defined(HAVE_GETADDRINFO) && defined(HAVE_GAI_STRERROR)\
> && defined(ENABLE_IP V6)
^^^^^
> # define INET6
> #endif /* HAVE_GETADDRINFO && HAVE_GAI_STRERROR && ENABLE_IPV6 */
>
> Are the other two symbols not being defined?
is the difference underlined above deliberate?
BTW in the theological debate, i tend to support DK,
on the usual ground that we have little influence over sites out there,
so Lynx should be given shock absorbers to handle bad ones;
if necessary, such choices can be made user-defined options.
--
========================,,============================================
SUPPORT ___________//___, Philip Webb : address@hidden
ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Centre for Urban & Community Studies
TRANSIT `-O----------O---' University of Toronto
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to address@hidden
Re: lynx-dev Revised patch for HTFTP.c, Klaus Weide, 2000/08/19
- Re: lynx-dev Revised patch for HTFTP.c, pg, 2000/08/19
- Re: lynx-dev Revised patch for HTFTP.c, Doug Kaufman, 2000/08/19
- Re: lynx-dev Revised patch for HTFTP.c, Klaus Weide, 2000/08/20
- Re: lynx-dev Revised patch for HTFTP.c, Doug Kaufman, 2000/08/20
- Re: lynx-dev Revised patch for HTFTP.c, Duncan Simpson, 2000/08/21