[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev "sticky" things
From: |
Vlad Harchev |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev "sticky" things |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Oct 1999 23:54:56 +0500 (SAMST) |
On Mon, 18 Oct 1999, Henry Nelson wrote:
> > > > > CONFIRM_TEXTFIELD_PREV_DOC:NEVER|IFEDITED|ALWAYS
> > > > >
> > > > > If value is NEVER, PREV_DOC_QUERY will be never asked,
> > > > > IFEDITED - old behaviour
> > > > > ALWAYS - ask always.
> >
> > I have an addition to propose: IF_NOT_EMPTY.
> > If the field is completely empty, the Left Arrow keystroke was most likely
>
> Will this change then do away with, i.e., supersede, *both* #STICKY_INPUTS
> and #STICKY_FIELDS? It was never clear to me what either of the STICKY_*
> defines were doing or if they interacted with each other, so I just didn't
> put them into my lynx.cfg, praying that the compiled default was the same
> as always. If it will combine them and clear up the meaning at the same
> time, I really hope you'll consider spending some time on it, Vlad.
STICKY_FIELDS is quite ortogonal with STICKY_INPUTS. So STICKY_INPUTS will
remain. I suggest to read its description and/or try it in use.
Thanks for your opinion.
>[...]
Best regards,
-Vlad
- Re: lynx-dev "sticky" things, Larry W. Virden, 1999/10/16
- Re: lynx-dev "sticky" things, T.E.Dickey, 1999/10/16
- Re: lynx-dev "sticky" things, Henry Nelson, 1999/10/18
- Re: lynx-dev "sticky" things,
Vlad Harchev <=
- Re: lynx-dev "sticky" things, Henry Nelson, 1999/10/18
- Re: lynx-dev "sticky" things, Henry Nelson, 1999/10/18
- Re: lynx-dev "sticky" things, Henry Nelson, 1999/10/18