[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LYNX-DEV Re: ...vulnerability in Lynx...
From: |
Larry W. Virden, x2487 |
Subject: |
Re: LYNX-DEV Re: ...vulnerability in Lynx... |
Date: |
Fri, 9 May 1997 04:08:39 -0400 |
>If you mean "for direct use as temp_space", then it is not okay, since the
>sticky bit will not prevent writing to existing files owned by others
>including symlinks, AFAIK.
On Solaris 2.5.1, if the file in a sticky bit directory is 666, then anyone
can write to it.
--
Larry W. Virden INET: address@hidden
<URL:http://www.teraform.com/%7Elvirden/> <*> O- "We are all Kosh."
Unless explicitly stated to the contrary, nothing in this posting should
be construed as representing my employer's opinions.
;
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send a mail message to address@hidden
; with "unsubscribe lynx-dev" (without the
; quotation marks) on a line by itself.
;
- Re: LYNX-DEV Re: ...vulnerability in Lynx..., Scott McGee (Personal), 1997/05/07
- Re: LYNX-DEV Re: ...vulnerability in Lynx..., Bela Lubkin, 1997/05/08
- Re: LYNX-DEV Re: ...vulnerability in Lynx..., Jonathan Sergent, 1997/05/08
- Re: LYNX-DEV Re: ...vulnerability in Lynx..., Larry W. Virden, x2487, 1997/05/08
- Re: LYNX-DEV Re: ...vulnerability in Lynx..., Jonathan Sergent, 1997/05/08
- Re: LYNX-DEV Re: ...vulnerability in Lynx..., Klaus Weide, 1997/05/08
- Re: LYNX-DEV Re: ...vulnerability in Lynx..., Jonathan Sergent, 1997/05/09
- Re: LYNX-DEV Re: ...vulnerability in Lynx...,
Larry W. Virden, x2487 <=
Re: LYNX-DEV Re: ...vulnerability in Lynx..., Nelson Henry Eric, 1997/05/09
Re: LYNX-DEV Re: ...vulnerability in Lynx..., Brian Tillman, x8425, 1997/05/09
Re: LYNX-DEV Re: ...vulnerability in Lynx..., Scott McGee (Personal), 1997/05/09