[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LYNX-DEV Binary distribution: an evaluation.
From: |
Al Gilman |
Subject: |
Re: LYNX-DEV Binary distribution: an evaluation. |
Date: |
Fri, 6 Dec 1996 09:57:35 -0500 (EST) |
Actually, after taking some flak from name bigots like me, I suspect
that y'all with the SysOp experience can work this out better. But
I did want to make another observation:
From: Michael Richardson <address@hidden>
We'd know about it...
I could be ftp.istar.browser.org, cause I'm connected to istar (one
nation wide NSP). Russ could be ftp.onet.browser.org cause he will be
moving to an ONet (a regional portion of another NSP) connected ISP.
Maybe, we'll eventually get that WaveLan going between the bunch of
us. Our offices are only 1km apart.
If the names are
ftp1.ottawa-ca.browser.org
ftp2.ottawa-ca.browser.org
we haven't helped the person in Guelph figure out which of
these two is going to be quicker. But when the alternatives are
ftp.barbados.browser.org #deprecated
ftp.denmark.browser.org
...
I think that the subscriber in Chicoutimi can guess to try one of
the Ottawa sites and not Barbados.
Ishtar vs. Onet helps the expert achieve the last degree of fine
tuning. But it leaves the novice in the dark. ontario-ca lets
the newbie make the first step. Maybe we want instructions for
running a timed ping on the foot of the ftp archive listing page.
We still have the option to put clues for site selection in plain
HTML text on the Web pages listing server offerings.
Al Gilman
;
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send a mail message to address@hidden
; with "unsubscribe lynx-dev" (without the
; quotation marks) on a line by itself.
;
- LYNX-DEV Binary distribution: an evaluation., Subir Grewal, 1996/12/05
- Re: LYNX-DEV Binary distribution: an evaluation., Rob Partington, 1996/12/05
- Re: LYNX-DEV Binary distribution: an evaluation., Duncan Hill, 1996/12/05
- Re: LYNX-DEV Binary distribution: an evaluation., Jim Spath (Webmaster Jim), 1996/12/05
- Re: LYNX-DEV Binary distribution: an evaluation., Al Gilman, 1996/12/05
- Re: LYNX-DEV Binary distribution: an evaluation., Russell McOrmond, 1996/12/05
- Re: LYNX-DEV Binary distribution: an evaluation., Subir Grewal, 1996/12/06
- Re: LYNX-DEV Binary distribution: an evaluation., Michael Richardson, 1996/12/06
- Re: LYNX-DEV Binary distribution: an evaluation.,
Al Gilman <=
- Re: LYNX-DEV Binary distribution: an evaluation., Jason Baker, 1996/12/06
- Re: LYNX-DEV Binary distribution: an evaluation., Duncan Hill, 1996/12/06
Re: LYNX-DEV Binary distribution: an evaluation., Jim Spath (Webmaster Jim), 1996/12/05
Re: LYNX-DEV Binary distribution: an evaluation., Michael Richardson, 1996/12/05
- Re: LYNX-DEV Binary distribution: an evaluation., Christopher R. Maden, 1996/12/05
- Re: LYNX-DEV Binary distribution: an evaluation., Duncan Hill, 1996/12/05
- Re: LYNX-DEV Binary distribution: an evaluation., Subir Grewal, 1996/12/05
- Re: LYNX-DEV Binary distribution: an evaluation., Drazen Kacar, 1996/12/05
- Re: LYNX-DEV Binary distribution: an evaluation., Duncan Hill, 1996/12/05
- Re: LYNX-DEV Binary distribution: an evaluation., Larry W. Virden, x2487, 1996/12/05