lwip-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lwip-users] freertos + lwip = no uart ?


From: unnamed
Subject: Re: [lwip-users] freertos + lwip = no uart ?
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 11:25:25 -0700 (MST)

hmm rtos is running at higher priority than lwip so i think thats not it. but i wonder if it's relevant ? i don't use lwip right now, i just compile it into my project, but no lwip_init() is called. i dont include any .h files right now in my main.c or other project files.
task with test printf() have also blinking led and vTaskDelay() - led blinks but no message from uart.

but maybe it's just about 8kb of ram ? i didn't found anywhere about minimal requirements and after seeing project called lwip-avr (or something like that) i thought that it should run on xmega - right now i think that's what's wrong with my application.
raw lwip without os should work on my chip ?



2015-07-28 18:27 GMT+02:00 Noam weissman [via lwIP] <[hidden email]>:
Hi,

The code I placed was just an example.

In any case the RTOS timer interrupt should run at a higher
priority then ETH. The reason is that if you have critical
section in your code they will not be homered.

Just my two cents input...

BR,
Noam.


-----Original Message-----
From: lwip-users-bounces+noam=[hidden email] on behalf of FreeRTOS Info
Sent: Tue 7/28/2015 5:10 PM
To: Mailing list for lwIP users
Subject: Re: [lwip-users] freertos + lwip = no uart ?
 

> I never had problems with UARTS but I did have problems with LwIP when
> interrupts priorities were
>
> not defined properly versus the FreeRTOS interrupt.
>
> 1.

<snip>

As far as I recall the XMega port does not support interrupt nesting, so
the parameters you highlight are not implemented for that code.

Regards,
Richard.

+ http://www.FreeRTOS.org
Designed for simplicity. More than 113000 downloads in 2014.

+ http://www.FreeRTOS.org/plus
IoT, Trace, Certification, FAT FS, TCP/IP, Training, and more...


_______________________________________________
lwip-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users

 
 
************************************************************************************
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer viruses.
************************************************************************************







************************************************************************************
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer viruses.
************************************************************************************




_______________________________________________
lwip-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users

winmail.dat (5K) Download Attachment



If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
http://lwip.100.n7.nabble.com/freertos-lwip-no-uart-tp24724p24739.html
To unsubscribe from freertos + lwip = no uart ?, click here.
NAML



View this message in context: Re: freertos + lwip = no uart ?
Sent from the lwip-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]