[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lwip-users] freertos + lwip = no uart ?
|
From: |
FreeRTOS Info |
|
Subject: |
Re: [lwip-users] freertos + lwip = no uart ? |
|
Date: |
Tue, 28 Jul 2015 15:10:25 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0 |
I never had problems with UARTS but I did have problems with LwIP when
interrupts priorities were
not defined properly versus the FreeRTOS interrupt.
1.
<snip>
As far as I recall the XMega port does not support interrupt nesting, so
the parameters you highlight are not implemented for that code.
Regards,
Richard.
+ http://www.FreeRTOS.org
Designed for simplicity. More than 113000 downloads in 2014.
+ http://www.FreeRTOS.org/plus
IoT, Trace, Certification, FAT FS, TCP/IP, Training, and more...
- [lwip-users] freertos + lwip = no uart ?, unnamed, 2015/07/27
- Re: [lwip-users] freertos + lwip = no uart ?, Adam Fullerton, 2015/07/28
- Re: [lwip-users] freertos + lwip = no uart ?, Damian Martyniuk, 2015/07/28
- Re: [lwip-users] freertos + lwip = no uart ?, Adam Fullerton, 2015/07/28
- Re: [lwip-users] freertos + lwip = no uart ?, Grzegorz Niemirowski, 2015/07/28
- Re: [lwip-users] freertos + lwip = no uart ?, unnamed, 2015/07/28
- Re: [lwip-users] freertos + lwip = no uart ?, Noam Weissman, 2015/07/28
- Re: [lwip-users] freertos + lwip = no uart ?,
FreeRTOS Info <=
- Re: [lwip-users] freertos + lwip = no uart ?, Noam Weissman, 2015/07/28
- Re: [lwip-users] freertos + lwip = no uart ?, unnamed, 2015/07/28
- Re: [lwip-users] freertos + lwip = no uart ?, Noam Weissman, 2015/07/28
- Re: [lwip-users] freertos + lwip = no uart ?, Krzysztof WesoĊowski, 2015/07/28