[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [lwip-users] bug report
From: |
Bill Auerbach |
Subject: |
RE: [lwip-users] bug report |
Date: |
Fri, 5 Mar 2010 12:38:15 -0500 |
>I think his point is that we're assuming that %x exists on his platform
>by hardcoding %02x in the code, whereas on his platform he needs to use
>something other than %x to get a hex output.
Assumptions are made that a standard (C89) compiler is being used. %02x is
in that and later standards.
The h in %hx might be the problem, but it's not necessary as Jeff points out
due to standard integer promotion.
Bill
- [lwip-users] bug report, Martin Velek, 2010/03/05
- Re: [lwip-users] bug report, Jeff Barber, 2010/03/05
- Re: [lwip-users] bug report, Kieran Mansley, 2010/03/05
- RE: [lwip-users] bug report,
Bill Auerbach <=
- Re: [lwip-users] bug report, Martin Velek, 2010/03/05
- Re: [lwip-users] bug report, address@hidden, 2010/03/07
- Re: [lwip-users] bug report, robin, 2010/03/07
- Re: [lwip-users] bug report, Martin Velek, 2010/03/07
- Re: [lwip-users] bug report, address@hidden, 2010/03/07
- Re: [lwip-users] bug report, Kieran Mansley, 2010/03/08
- Re: [lwip-users] bug report, Jeff Barber, 2010/03/05