Re: [lwip-users] Fwd: Lwip and SNMP support

[Yigal Hochberg]

Simon,

I would like to add a separate compile-time option for ipstack mib-2 data.
Please see my other email related to the topic. 

Please let me know how I can help if you are willing to get help and contributions from others. 
I am ok with keeping your c style (will have to tell Emacs to us the spaces you require.

net-snmp appears "heavy-duty", but it can be put on a diet. I think this can appeal to people 
who are need for a complete snmpv2c or snmpv3. I agree, this is not trivial effort.

For mib-compiler I think the best candidate is libsmi to which you can write your own beck-end.
This is what we use for front-end. I think you can write a back-end after you have a clear idea
of how add mib extension to the agent. (I am not familiar with  lwip mib extension).

Thanks,

Yigal

On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 4:42 PM, address@hidden <address@hidden> wrote:

Yigal Hochberg wrote:

I will be happy to help with a better snmp-agent in lwip.

Great to hear that! What would you make better?

At the same time, we offer a more complete, comprehensive solution
to customers who use any ipstack and prefer to use our solution,
typically for snmpv2c, snmpv3 and mib-extension.

I understand the need for v2c and v3 - BTW, we have private MIBs, too, however, a MIB compiler is yet missing.

We already have a working SNMPv3 with  Lwip on w32 platform

OK, so why do you need us to change the stack if it already works?

A longer future idea is to integrate net-snmp agent to lwip.

Personally, I think that the net-snmp agent does not well suit the "lightweight" idea behind lwIP. However, I only had a short look on it some years ago when we decided against it...

Simon


_______________________________________________
lwip-users mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users

-- 
Yigal