Re: [lwip-users] [OT] why raw API?

lwip-users

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lwip-users] [OT] why raw API?

From:	Clément David
Subject:	Re: [lwip-users] [OT] why raw API?
Date:	Wed, 29 Jul 2009 08:30:47 +0200
User-agent:	Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605)

Why do nearly all people on this list seem to use the raw API instead ofnetconn or sockets?
Performance-gain? Flexibility?

I'm using the raw API to implement my own API which is specified byothers. It is really useful and provide room for hard tweaking(reduction on non-blocking case).


Clément

clement_david.vcf
Description: Vcard

[Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

[lwip-users] [OT] why raw API?, Fabian Koch, 2009/07/29
- Re: [lwip-users] [OT] why raw API?, Simon Goldschmidt, 2009/07/29
- Re: [lwip-users] [OT] why raw API?, Clément David <=
- Re: [lwip-users] [OT] why raw API?, Mike Kleshov, 2009/07/29
  - Re: [lwip-users] [OT] why raw API?, Chris_S, 2009/07/29
- Re: [lwip-users] [OT] why raw API?, Marek, 2009/07/29

Prev by Date: Re: [lwip-users] [OT] why raw API?
Next by Date: Re: [lwip-users] How to correctly receive data
Previous by thread: Re: [lwip-users] [OT] why raw API?
Next by thread: Re: [lwip-users] [OT] why raw API?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread