[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lwip-users] LWIP Process Model confusion:
From: |
Simon Goldschmidt |
Subject: |
Re: [lwip-users] LWIP Process Model confusion: |
Date: |
Mon, 15 Dec 2008 07:55:26 +0100 |
>
> Can you be a little more specific? What do u mean, when u say just post a
> message. This isnt clear to me implementation wise, :(
> According to me, i was thinking of setting a shared memory segment b/w
> processes through shmget, but implementation wise i dont get it how my idea
> would work.
> A little help from you, and i might able to get through.
I think we were talking about using mailboxes, not shared memory: at least on
unix systems, there is something like mailboxes (if I remember correctly) that
work for interprocess communication; you don't have to code that yourself using
shared memory.
Simon
--
Psssst! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger gehört? Der kann`s mit allen:
http://www.gmx.net/de/go/multimessenger
- Re: [lwip-users] LWIP Process Model confusion:, (continued)
- Re: [lwip-users] LWIP Process Model confusion:, Simon Goldschmidt, 2008/12/10
- Re: [lwip-users] LWIP Process Model confusion:, Kieran Mansley, 2008/12/10
- Re: [lwip-users] LWIP Process Model confusion:, sandy tewari, 2008/12/13
- Re: [lwip-users] LWIP Process Model confusion:, address@hidden, 2008/12/14
- Re: [lwip-users] LWIP Process Model confusion:, sandy tewari, 2008/12/14
- Re: [lwip-users] LWIP Process Model confusion:, Rishi Khan, 2008/12/14
- Re: [lwip-users] LWIP Process Model confusion:, address@hidden, 2008/12/14
- Re: [lwip-users] LWIP Process Model confusion:, Rishi Khan, 2008/12/14
- Re: [lwip-users] LWIP Process Model confusion:, Simon Goldschmidt, 2008/12/15
- Re: [lwip-users] LWIP Process Model confusion:, sandy tewari, 2008/12/14
- Re: [lwip-users] LWIP Process Model confusion:,
Simon Goldschmidt <=