[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lwip-users] LWIP Process Model confusion:
From: |
Simon Goldschmidt |
Subject: |
Re: [lwip-users] LWIP Process Model confusion: |
Date: |
Mon, 15 Dec 2008 07:53:33 +0100 |
> I don't think the core would have to free anything in the case of the
> threaded code. If you are a one machine system, don't actually copy
> the data in the mbox_post: Ignore the size.
The sender side stays of course the same, no modifications needed.
> If you are a multiprocess machine, you have to allocate the space in
> the sys_mbox_post code on the other client machine (or process), and
> it might be a little tricky. The sender's (or poster) side should be
> easy. I have to think about the recv/fetch side.
That's what I meant: We would have to insert sys_mbox_msg_free() or something
throughout the code where sys_(arch_)mbox_get() is used after we are finished
with the messages. I don't know for sure this would be the only necessary
modification for multiprocessing, but I guess so.
Simon
--
Psssst! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger gehört? Der kann`s mit allen:
http://www.gmx.net/de/go/multimessenger
- Re: [lwip-users] LWIP Process Model confusion:, (continued)
- Re: [lwip-users] LWIP Process Model confusion:, yueyue papa, 2008/12/06
- Re: [lwip-users] LWIP Process Model confusion:, Kieran Mansley, 2008/12/09
- Re: [lwip-users] LWIP Process Model confusion:, Simon Goldschmidt, 2008/12/10
- Re: [lwip-users] LWIP Process Model confusion:, Kieran Mansley, 2008/12/10
- Re: [lwip-users] LWIP Process Model confusion:, sandy tewari, 2008/12/13
- Re: [lwip-users] LWIP Process Model confusion:, address@hidden, 2008/12/14
- Re: [lwip-users] LWIP Process Model confusion:, sandy tewari, 2008/12/14
- Re: [lwip-users] LWIP Process Model confusion:, Rishi Khan, 2008/12/14
- Re: [lwip-users] LWIP Process Model confusion:, address@hidden, 2008/12/14
- Re: [lwip-users] LWIP Process Model confusion:, Rishi Khan, 2008/12/14
- Re: [lwip-users] LWIP Process Model confusion:,
Simon Goldschmidt <=
- Re: [lwip-users] LWIP Process Model confusion:, sandy tewari, 2008/12/14
- Re: [lwip-users] LWIP Process Model confusion:, Simon Goldschmidt, 2008/12/15