[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lwip-users] SOCK_RAW
From: |
Larry Piggins |
Subject: |
Re: [lwip-users] SOCK_RAW |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Feb 2004 05:27:56 -0800 (PST) |
--- address@hidden wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, Jani Monoses wrote:
> > No but we can have a poll :)
>
> I'm only posting this to provide some balance... I'm
> sure there must be a
> better way to conduct a poll than have everybody
> e-mail everybody else.
>
> We use the event-driven interfaces exclusively, and
> these interfaces were
> high on the list for choosing lwIP in the first
> place - the BSD socket
> interface is in my experience a poor design, and
> something to try to
> get away from.
>
> --
> Luke
>
I'm in the same boat with Luke, using the event
interface only on a system without an RTOS, and that I
agree that this "poll" is a waste of bandwidth.
Larry
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard - Read only the mail you want.
http://antispam.yahoo.com/tools
- [lwip-users] SOCK_RAW, Ed Sutter, 2004/02/23
- Re: [lwip-users] SOCK_RAW, Jani Monoses, 2004/02/23
- Re: [lwip-users] SOCK_RAW, Jani Monoses, 2004/02/23
- Re: [lwip-users] SOCK_RAW, Ed Sutter, 2004/02/23
- Re: [lwip-users] SOCK_RAW, Ed Sutter, 2004/02/23
- Re: [lwip-users] SOCK_RAW, Jani Monoses, 2004/02/24
- Re: [lwip-users] SOCK_RAW, christiaan . simons, 2004/02/24
- Re: [lwip-users] SOCK_RAW, Kieran Mansley, 2004/02/24
- Re: [lwip-users] SOCK_RAW, Peter Graf, 2004/02/24
- Re: [lwip-users] SOCK_RAW, lukem . lwip, 2004/02/24
- Re: [lwip-users] SOCK_RAW,
Larry Piggins <=
- Re: [lwip-users] SOCK_RAW, Kaos, 2004/02/25
- Re: [lwip-users] SOCK_RAW, Leon Woestenberg, 2004/02/26
- Re: [lwip-users] SOCK_RAW, Ed Sutter, 2004/02/27
- Re: [lwip-users] SOCK_RAW, Kieran Mansley, 2004/02/27