[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lwip-users] SOCK_RAW
From: |
lukem . lwip |
Subject: |
Re: [lwip-users] SOCK_RAW |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Feb 2004 09:44:32 +1100 (EST) |
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, Jani Monoses wrote:
> No but we can have a poll :)
I'm only posting this to provide some balance... I'm sure there must be a
better way to conduct a poll than have everybody e-mail everybody else.
We use the event-driven interfaces exclusively, and these interfaces were
high on the list for choosing lwIP in the first place - the BSD socket
interface is in my experience a poor design, and something to try to
get away from.
--
Luke
- [lwip-users] SOCK_RAW, Ed Sutter, 2004/02/23
- Re: [lwip-users] SOCK_RAW, Jani Monoses, 2004/02/23
- Re: [lwip-users] SOCK_RAW, Jani Monoses, 2004/02/23
- Re: [lwip-users] SOCK_RAW, Ed Sutter, 2004/02/23
- Re: [lwip-users] SOCK_RAW, Ed Sutter, 2004/02/23
- Re: [lwip-users] SOCK_RAW, Jani Monoses, 2004/02/24
- Re: [lwip-users] SOCK_RAW, christiaan . simons, 2004/02/24
- Re: [lwip-users] SOCK_RAW, Kieran Mansley, 2004/02/24
- Re: [lwip-users] SOCK_RAW, Peter Graf, 2004/02/24
- Re: [lwip-users] SOCK_RAW,
lukem . lwip <=
- Re: [lwip-users] SOCK_RAW, Larry Piggins, 2004/02/25
- Re: [lwip-users] SOCK_RAW, Kaos, 2004/02/25
- Re: [lwip-users] SOCK_RAW, Leon Woestenberg, 2004/02/26
- Re: [lwip-users] SOCK_RAW, Ed Sutter, 2004/02/27
- Re: [lwip-users] SOCK_RAW, Kieran Mansley, 2004/02/27