[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lwip-devel] [Patch] missing indent in stats.c
From: |
Kieran Mansley |
Subject: |
Re: [lwip-devel] [Patch] missing indent in stats.c |
Date: |
Tue, 6 Mar 2012 20:19:44 +0000 |
On 24 Feb 2012, at 20:46, Gisle Vanem wrote:
> Shouldn't there be some extra indenting in stats.c? Like this:
>
> --- Git-latest\src\core\stats.c Mon Oct 24 13:34:20 2011
> +++ src\core\stats.c Tue Nov 29 22:59:26 2011
> @@ -99,8 +99,8 @@
> LWIP_PLATFORM_DIAG(("memerr: %"STAT_COUNTER_F"\n\t", igmp->memerr));
> LWIP_PLATFORM_DIAG(("proterr: %"STAT_COUNTER_F"\n\t", igmp->proterr));
> LWIP_PLATFORM_DIAG(("rx_v1: %"STAT_COUNTER_F"\n\t", igmp->rx_v1));
> - LWIP_PLATFORM_DIAG(("rx_group: %"STAT_COUNTER_F"\n", igmp->rx_group));
> - LWIP_PLATFORM_DIAG(("rx_general: %"STAT_COUNTER_F"\n", igmp->rx_general));
> + LWIP_PLATFORM_DIAG(("rx_group: %"STAT_COUNTER_F"\n\t", igmp->rx_group));
> + LWIP_PLATFORM_DIAG(("rx_general: %"STAT_COUNTER_F"\n\t",
> igmp->rx_general));
> LWIP_PLATFORM_DIAG(("rx_report: %"STAT_COUNTER_F"\n\t", igmp->rx_report));
> LWIP_PLATFORM_DIAG(("tx_join: %"STAT_COUNTER_F"\n\t", igmp->tx_join));
> LWIP_PLATFORM_DIAG(("tx_leave: %"STAT_COUNTER_F"\n\t", igmp->tx_leave));
It makes sense to me that they should all be consistent, and we need to add the
missing \t that your patch adds. Could you file a bug on savannah so that it
doesn't get forgotten?
Thanks
Kieran
- Re: [lwip-devel] [Patch] missing indent in stats.c,
Kieran Mansley <=