[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lwip-devel] [patch #7683] u32_t should be time_t in some cases
From: |
Mike Pontillo |
Subject: |
[lwip-devel] [patch #7683] u32_t should be time_t in some cases |
Date: |
Mon, 12 Dec 2011 19:21:48 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_7_2) AppleWebKit/535.2 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/15.0.874.121 Safari/535.2 |
Follow-up Comment #6, patch #7683 (project lwip):
You are correct. My patch was incomplete. (sorry, juggling multiple divergent
codebases here, so can't directly diff my changes)
I forgot about a few other changes I made to sys_arch.c. I had changed
cond_wait() to return a time_t, and changed sys_arch_sem_wait()'s time_needed
to be a time_t. This was because in cond_wait() I changed the type of the
'tdiff' variable to time_t as well, to accurately reflect the fields of
'struct timeval'.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.nongnu.org/patch/?7683>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.nongnu.org/
- [lwip-devel] [patch #7683] u32_t should be time_t in some cases, Mike Pontillo, 2011/12/08
- [lwip-devel] [patch #7683] u32_t should be time_t in some cases, Simon Goldschmidt, 2011/12/09
- [lwip-devel] [patch #7683] u32_t should be time_t in some cases, Mike Pontillo, 2011/12/09
- [lwip-devel] [patch #7683] u32_t should be time_t in some cases, Simon Goldschmidt, 2011/12/09
- [lwip-devel] [patch #7683] u32_t should be time_t in some cases, Mike Pontillo, 2011/12/12
- [lwip-devel] [patch #7683] u32_t should be time_t in some cases, Simon Goldschmidt, 2011/12/12
- [lwip-devel] [patch #7683] u32_t should be time_t in some cases,
Mike Pontillo <=
- [lwip-devel] [patch #7683] u32_t should be time_t in some cases, Mike Pontillo, 2011/12/12
- [lwip-devel] [patch #7683] unix port is missing some explicit casts, Simon Goldschmidt, 2011/12/13