[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [lwip-devel] byte order, packing, optimizations
From: |
Kieran Mansley |
Subject: |
RE: [lwip-devel] byte order, packing, optimizations |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Feb 2010 14:14:13 +0000 |
On Tue, 2010-02-16 at 08:29 -0500, Bill Auerbach wrote:
> Does this mean you do not want tasks and patches submitted for performance
> enhancements? From the posts on lwip-users, performance may be more
> important for some users than you are willing to agree with or admit to. The
> point is, if those of us who are trying to improve performance are wasting
> our time contributing and making suggestions it would be really good to know
> that.
No, you're not wasting your time. I do want tasks and patches submitted
for performance enhancements. But any changes that make lwIP less
portable etc. need some justification, and as performance is not one of
the goals of the project (but being portable and lightweight are) it is
unlikely to take precedence.
Kieran
- Re: [lwip-devel] byte order, packing, optimizations, (continued)
- RE: [lwip-devel] byte order, packing, optimizations, Stéphane Lesage, 2010/02/14
- RE: [lwip-devel] byte order, packing, optimizations, Stéphane Lesage, 2010/02/14
- Re: [lwip-devel] byte order, packing, optimizations, address@hidden, 2010/02/15
- RE: [lwip-devel] byte order, packing, optimizations, Bill Auerbach, 2010/02/15
- Re: [lwip-devel] byte order, packing, optimizations, address@hidden, 2010/02/15
- Re: [lwip-devel] byte order, packing, optimizations, Kieran Mansley, 2010/02/16
- RE: [lwip-devel] byte order, packing, optimizations, Bill Auerbach, 2010/02/16
- RE: [lwip-devel] byte order, packing, optimizations, Simon Goldschmidt, 2010/02/16
- RE: [lwip-devel] byte order, packing, optimizations,
Kieran Mansley <=