[lwip-devel] [task #6880] netconn API misses some error forwarding

[Simon Goldschmidt]

Follow-up Comment #2, task #6880 (project lwip):

I don't prefer one to the other, I think. We only have to make sure we do
process all errors somehow. What I'm not sure is whether to check that
TCP-functions (connect...) are used only called for tcp pcbs or if we cover
that using asserts...

About the switch code: I think compilers can optimize this just like big if
statements, and I sometimes think the switch is better to read... Maybe you
post a patch of what you think?

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.nongnu.org/task/?6880>

_______________________________________________
  Nachricht geschickt von/durch Savannah
  http://savannah.nongnu.org/