Re: [lmi] [lmi-commits] odd/eraseme_long_double_irr cca9eaa5 1/3: Pass floating-point scalar arguments by value

[Vadim Zeitlin]

On Sat, 30 Apr 2022 17:57:39 +0000 Greg Chicares <gchicares@sbcglobal.net> 
wrote:

GC> On 4/30/22 16:55, Vadim Zeitlin wrote:
GC> > On Sat, 30 Apr 2022 12:17:39 -0400 (EDT) Greg Chicares 
<gchicares@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
GC> > 
GC> > GC> branch: odd/eraseme_long_double_irr
GC> > GC> commit cca9eaa5559d7f7aadefd590e148849b6e0d327b
GC> > GC> Author: Gregory W. Chicares <gchicares@sbcglobal.net>
GC> > GC> Commit: Gregory W. Chicares <gchicares@sbcglobal.net>
GC> > GC> 
GC> > GC>     Pass floating-point scalar arguments by value
GC> > 
GC> >  This is another of those curious-but-not-curious-enough-to-test-myself
GC> > questions: does this have any noticeable effect on performance?
[...]
GC> IOW, TL;DR: "No".

 Just to contradict my previous email, here is one benchmark which gave the
expected result, thank you.

 Of course, now I don't know if I should be relieved because at least some
things work as I thought they should or annoyed because I can't rely on the
general principle of benchmarks being always surprising any more.

 Thanks again,
VZ

pgpbsBg0hlZEM.pgp
Description: PGP signature