lmi
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lmi] Concinnity check and hardcoded paths


From: Vadim Zeitlin
Subject: Re: [lmi] Concinnity check and hardcoded paths
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 14:03:18 +0200

On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 01:11:44 +0000 Greg Chicares <gchicares@sbcglobal.net> 
wrote:

GC> The widespread assumption that 'prefix="/opt/lmi"' is probably harder
GC> to alleviate

 Yes, and to be clear, I don't suggest doing it right now, we've already
done enough build system changes to keep me happy for quite some time,
thank you.

[...discussion snipped...]
GC> It's an actual defect, because a fresh checkout of lmi fails
GC> the concinnity test. Therefore, I should fix that defect,
GC> and then you'll have no need to work around it. Sound okay?

 No, sounds perfect!

 Thanks,
VZ

Attachment: pgpKeBSf9qvbf.pgp
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]