[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lmi] Concinnity check and hardcoded paths
From: |
Vadim Zeitlin |
Subject: |
Re: [lmi] Concinnity check and hardcoded paths |
Date: |
Tue, 13 Oct 2020 14:03:18 +0200 |
On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 01:11:44 +0000 Greg Chicares <gchicares@sbcglobal.net>
wrote:
GC> The widespread assumption that 'prefix="/opt/lmi"' is probably harder
GC> to alleviate
Yes, and to be clear, I don't suggest doing it right now, we've already
done enough build system changes to keep me happy for quite some time,
thank you.
[...discussion snipped...]
GC> It's an actual defect, because a fresh checkout of lmi fails
GC> the concinnity test. Therefore, I should fix that defect,
GC> and then you'll have no need to work around it. Sound okay?
No, sounds perfect!
Thanks,
VZ
pgpKeBSf9qvbf.pgp
Description: PGP signature