lmi
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lmi] XML sorting


From: Vadim Zeitlin
Subject: Re: [lmi] XML sorting
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2017 16:04:35 +0200

On Sun, 27 Aug 2017 13:48:21 +0000 Greg Chicares <address@hidden> wrote:

GC> On 2017-08-27 12:50, Vadim Zeitlin wrote:
GC> > On Sun, 27 Aug 2017 12:23:16 +0000 Greg Chicares <address@hidden> wrote:
GC> [...]
GC> > GC> BTW, we will still need one XSL template, 'sort_cell_subelements.xsl',
GC> > GC> and therefore I suspect that 'ledger_xsl.?pp' cannot be removed.
GC> > 
GC> >  This is unfortunate... Keeping the file is not a problem, of course, but
GC> > does this mean that we'd also have to keep all the code for invoking FOP
GC> > etc? Can't we really get rid of it?
GC> 
GC> We can certainly get rid of everything that's specific to FOP.

 Then there doesn't seem to be any need to keep ledger_xsl.?pp.

GC> We do need to retain
GC>   {multiple,single}_cell_document::validate_with_xsd_schema()
GC>   {multiple,single}_cell_document::cell_sorter()

 Yes, I did see this when I was wondering, in the beginning of this
project, whether we needed to keep using libxslt at all (libxml itself is
used in more places, e.g. for the configuration settings, so there is no
question of removing dependency on it, but I hoped to get rid of this one).
But I didn't touch this code -- nor have I tested it, to be honest, but I
don't think I could have broken it...

GC> and I suspect that means we must also keep 'ledger_xsl.?pp'...

 Sorry again if I'm missing something obvious, but why do you think this?
VZ


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]