Re: [lmi] Converting...to svn? [Was: Savannah status]

[Greg Chicares]

On 2009-06-01 21:53Z, Vadim Zeitlin wrote:
> 
> Also, there are absolutely no redeeming features to cvs and it's not
> developed any more since many years. And migrating to svn from cvs should
> indeed be fairly easy (which is the reason I won't suggest migrating to hg
> or bzr instead although if you're ready to consider these DVCSs I'd gladly
> expand on why I think they could be a good idea).

I can easily see several clear advantages of moving from cvs to svn.
But, although I've spent a few hours here and there reading about
DVCSs, I've never noticed any reason why they'd be better for lmi.
What am I missing?