[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Linphone-users] New sip?.linphone.org addresses
From: |
Guillaume Bienkowski |
Subject: |
Re: [Linphone-users] New sip?.linphone.org addresses |
Date: |
Mon, 20 Apr 2015 09:06:40 +0200 |
Hello Ed,
We’re in the process of deploying a more resilient configuration of SIP
servers. sip3 should constitute the main server now, with sip as a
load-balancer. You should add these two IPs on your firewall. We will try to
communicate if we make further changes (if we add a 3rd server in the future).
Also, you’re right, we don’t own the /16 on these IPs (otherwise we’d be better
off selling them :-)).
Best regards,
Guillaume Bienkowski
address@hidden
> Le 19 avr. 2015 à 13:12, Ed Hynan <address@hidden> a écrit :
>
> Hi,
>
> Yesterday calls failed. I keep a tight firewall. I had been
> allowing incoming from 91.121.208.0/21 -- the CIDR bits were just
> a guess.
>
> Now I see incoming from sip3.linphone.org in a different net.
> These were blocked. I see hosts sip{,1,2,3,4,5}.linphone.org.
>
> From OVH whois records I have this:
> ## sip.linphone.org == sip1.linphone.org
> # 91.121.0.0/16 91.121.209.194 sip1.linphone.org
> # 94.23.0.0/16 94.23.19.176 sip2.linphone.org
> # 37.59.0.0/16 37.59.51.72 sip3.linphone.org
> # 5.196.0.0/16 5.196.76.142 sip4.linphone.org
> # 188.165.0.0/16 188.165.40.171 sip5.linphone.org
>
> I doubt linphone has /16 in each of those nets :)
>
> For the benefit of those with strict firewalls, will you specify
> the address ranges Linphone org will use to connect? (And
> announce changes?)
>
> Thanks,
> Ed Hynan
>
> --
>
> Churchill's Commentary on Man:
> Man will occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of the
> time he will pick himself up and continue on.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linphone-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/linphone-users