[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: quoted tuplet bracket within staff
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: quoted tuplet bracket within staff |
Date: |
Fri, 26 Nov 2021 15:29:07 +0000 (UTC) |
>> \override CueVoice.TupletBracket.direction = #DOWN
>> \override CueVoice.TupletBracket.edge-height = #'(-0.7 . -0.7)
>> \override CueVoice.TupletBracket.extra-offset = #'(0 . 4.75)
>> \override CueVoice.TupletNumber.extra-offset = #'(0 . 4.75)
>
> Hold the heavy machinery :-). You can just set the positions directly:
>
> \override CueVoice.TupletBracket.positions = #'(-2 . -1)
> \override CueVoice.TupletBracket.direction = #UP
Nice, thanks.
> For a general solution, one could probably write a callback for the
> positions property. How difficult this is probably depends on the
> use case: Werner, how similar are the instances in your score? Can
> we assume a monotonous sequence of pitches? May we assume that the
> bracket should always be above?
I need this to make the staves use less vertical space so that more
staves can be added to a part page. This means that a solution with
`extra-offset` is not helpful. Additionally, walking over all
triplets is tedious; there are a lot of them...
However, Kieren's approach is nice: It takes the slant of the beam and
simply shifts it up. In general I think this is what I want: Use the
original slant and shift the bracket up until it no longer collides
with the note heads (plus some padding).
Werner
- Re: quoted tuplet bracket within staff, (continued)
- Re: quoted tuplet bracket within staff, Kieren MacMillan, 2021/11/26
- Re: quoted tuplet bracket within staff, David Kastrup, 2021/11/26
- Re: quoted tuplet bracket within staff, Kieren MacMillan, 2021/11/26
- Re: quoted tuplet bracket within staff, David Kastrup, 2021/11/26
- Re: quoted tuplet bracket within staff, Jean Abou Samra, 2021/11/26
- Re: quoted tuplet bracket within staff, Werner LEMBERG, 2021/11/26
- Re: quoted tuplet bracket within staff,
Werner LEMBERG <=