Re: Start, end, gradient of Glissando

[Thomas Morley]

Am So., 24. Okt. 2021 um 18:19 Uhr schrieb Aaron Hill
<lilypond@hillvisions.com>:
>
> On 2021-10-24 8:05 am, Thomas Morley wrote:
> > Am So., 24. Okt. 2021 um 16:35 Uhr schrieb Aaron Hill
> >> Let me take a stab at converting the print routine to Scheme.
> >
> > Would be great !!
>
> Sorry for the delay...

Delay? I noticed no delay...

> took me some time to figure out why there was an
> error with cross-staff right-side Y coordinate after porting the logic
> from C++.  I think it's all working as expected, and I have added a few
> new test cases.  (NOTE: I only have 2.22.0 here, so I had to fixup the
> version statement.)  The one thing I did not include was adjusting the
> line ends for the arrows, but I assume the crosses would be best put at
> the arrow points anyway.

Great, I don't have time left today to study it, maybe tomorrow evening...

> There is something to note in the original logic.  If the padding is
> large enough that the line spanner would disappear, then the stencil
> returned is null.  I am also likewise returning the empty list instead
> of a point-pair, so the code that consumes the results would need to
> check for this case.

Understood.

>
> -- Aaron Hill

Again, many, many thanks!

Best,
  Harm