[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Cautionary clef collision with rest
From: |
Josiah Boothby |
Subject: |
Re: Cautionary clef collision with rest |
Date: |
Sun, 31 May 2020 23:09:53 -0700 |
Well, now at least I know of a way to move it around, but I have no
idea what the pair of numbers for x-extent mean (and #'(-5 . 5) puts
the clef in an even stranger place). Looking through the documentation
only tells me that X-extent takes two numbers, but doesn't actually
inform me of what those numbers *do*. *headdesk*
I'll tinker until I figure it out, but thanks for the pointer.
On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 10:53 PM Pierre Perol-Schneider
<pierre.schneider.paris@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Josiah,
>
> Maybe try:
>
> \version "2.20.0"
>
> {
> \clef F \time 3/4
> R2.*3
> \clef G
> g4 r r g r r
> \once\override Staff.Clef.X-extent = #'(-5 . 5)
> \clef F
> }
>
> and properly set the extent.
> HTH.
> Cheers,
> Pierre
>
> Le lun. 1 juin 2020 à 07:32, Josiah Boothby <josiahb@gmail.com> a écrit :
>>
>> I'm struggling to increase the padding for a cautionary clef in a
>> slightly crowded line, since it's colliding with rests when there are
>> notes on other lines. Attached is an image of the score I'm working
>> with as I'm struggling to come up with a concise test snippet that
>> doesn't have other problems. Should I instead adjust the measure
>> width? I'm using 2.20.0.
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Josiah