[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Rests vertical position problem
From: |
Jacques Menu |
Subject: |
Re: Rests vertical position problem |
Date: |
Tue, 19 May 2020 16:59:36 +0200 |
Hello Mark,
Thanks a lot, I looked at the snippets doc and missed that…
Will make good use of it!
JM
> Le 19 mai 2020 à 16:45, Mark Stephen Mrotek <address@hidden> a écrit :
>
> Jacques,
>
> Look at
> http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Search?q=merge+rests
>
> Mark
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lilypond-user [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=address@hidden]
> On Behalf Of Jacques Menu
> Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2020 12:32 AM
> To: lilypond-user <address@hidden>
> Subject: Re: Rests vertical position problem
>
> I know I could use \rest to control the placement of rests manually, but this
> code is created from MusicXML automatically.
> musicxml2ly exhibits the same behaviour as the first score shown, BTW.
>
> JM
>
>> Le 19 mai 2020 à 09:25, Jacques Menu <address@hidden> a écrit :
>>
>> Hello folks,
>>
>> In the attached example, the \voiceOne and \voiceTwo commands used for the
>> first score lead to the eigth rests in measure 2 to appear too high.
>>
>> Removing them as in the second score makes the look more satisfying in this
>> regard, but then measure 1 gets awful.
>>
>> Is there a way to use some equivalent of \voiceOne and \voiceTwo
>> measure-wise in such a case, using it only in measures that have more than
>> one voice playing?
>>
>> Thanks for your help!
>>
>> JM
>>
>> <PastedGraphic-2.tiff>
>>
>> <RestsVerticalPositionProblemSubmittedToList.ly>
>
>
Re: Rests vertical position problem, Robin Bannister, 2020/05/19