[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Musicology with Lilypond (and now correct attachments ;-)
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Musicology with Lilypond (and now correct attachments ;-) |
Date: |
Tue, 29 Oct 2019 00:26:20 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Urs Liska <address@hidden> writes:
> Am 29. Oktober 2019 00:04:06 MEZ schrieb David Kastrup <address@hidden>:
>>Andrew Bernard <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> I am finding this thread weird, sorry. There's a huge amount of help
>>in the
>>> archives of this list in how to install and run openlilylib. A quick
>>search
>>> would show that. It's a sort of FAQ.
>>>
>>> Also, lilypond is GPL, so does the following mean you are therefore
>>not
>>> able to even use the program Karsten?
>>>
>>> On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 at 06:20, Karsten Reincke <address@hidden>
>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> a) It is licensed under GPL. I think this is not appropriate for
>>music.
>>>> In a few days I will write a little article about this topic. But
>>>> without changing that license I cannot contribute to it.
>>>>
>>>> I fail to understand this. How can an open source licence not be
>>>> appropriate for music?
>>
>>Do you really want to force everybody giving sheet music to somebody
>>else to accompany it with a written offer to the LilyPond source code?
>>Or otherwise be prohibited from distribution?
>>
>>That's not really practical for most choir directors.
>
> This starts to get out of hands. The issue is of course not licensing
> music under the GPL. But that for some reason GPL is said to be
> unsuitable for a music-related *tool* like openLilyLib.
Sorry, I thought this was about sheet music source code.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: Musicology with Lilypond (and now correct attachments ;-), (continued)
- Re: Musicology with Lilypond (and now correct attachments ;-), Urs Liska, 2019/10/28
- Re: Musicology with Lilypond (and now correct attachments ;-), mason, 2019/10/28
- Re: Musicology with Lilypond (and now correct attachments ;-), Klaus Blum, 2019/10/28
- Re: Musicology with Lilypond (and now correct attachments ;-), mason, 2019/10/28
- Re: Musicology with Lilypond (and now correct attachments ;-), Urs Liska, 2019/10/29
- Copyright, was [Re: Musicology with Lilypond (and now correct attachments ;-)], Andrew Bernard, 2019/10/29
- Re: Copyright, was [Re: Musicology with Lilypond (and now correct attachments ;-)], N. Andrew Walsh, 2019/10/29
- Re: Copyright, was [Re: Musicology with Lilypond (and now correct attachments ;-)], Andrew Bernard, 2019/10/29
- Re: Copyright, was [Re: Musicology with Lilypond (and now correct attachments ;-)], Dick Seabrook, 2019/10/29
- Re: Copyright, was [Re: Musicology with Lilypond (and now correct attachments ; -)], David Kastrup, 2019/10/29