Re: [Spam] Re: Status and future of abc2ly

[Johan Vromans]

On Mon, 10 Dec 2018 12:21:44 +0100, Urs Liska <address@hidden> wrote:

> It sounds reasonable to drop the current abc2ly implementation. However, 
> I think we shouldn't do this without somehow including abc2xml in the 
> distribution and (probably) create a wrapper script abc2ly that 
> transparently replaces the old implementation and calls abc2xml | 
> musicxml2ly instead.

Sounds like simple and effective to me.

-- Johan