[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: partcombine with 3-4 voices, flags not merged
From: |
Kieren MacMillan |
Subject: |
Re: partcombine with 3-4 voices, flags not merged |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Nov 2018 14:59:03 -0500 |
Hi Eby,
> Too bad \partcombine is limited to two voices after all these years.
As they say: Patches are enthusiastically accepted. =)
> Following is the excerpt from the file i'm working on and the output with &
> without transparent flag and beam.
I still don’t understand why you don’t use chords… Especially given the number
of repetitions, this kind of coding is dead simple with chords:
RH = {
<cs' fs'>8 8 <cs' e'>8 8 8 8
}
LH = {
<cs gs>8 8 8 8 8 8
}
etc.
I don’t see the benefit of partcombine, even if it *did* accept more than two
voices.
Cheers,
Kieren.
________________________________
Kieren MacMillan, composer
‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info
‣ email: address@hidden
- partcombine with 3-4 voices, flags not merged, Eby Mani, 2018/11/15
- RE: partcombine with 3-4 voices, flags not merged, Eby Mani, 2018/11/15
- Re: partcombine with 3-4 voices, flags not merged, Eby Mani, 2018/11/15
- Re: partcombine with 3-4 voices, flags not merged,
Kieren MacMillan <=
- Re: partcombine with 3-4 voices, flags not merged, Eby Mani, 2018/11/16