[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: double time signature problem
From: |
Wols Lists |
Subject: |
Re: double time signature problem |
Date: |
Wed, 15 Nov 2017 14:56:55 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.0 |
On 15/11/17 10:51, Knut Petersen wrote:
> Am 15.11.2017 um 00:26 schrieb Noeck:
>>
>>> The diminutive of „Magd“ is „Mägdelein“ or maybe „Mägdchen“ (nobody
>>> would use the latter), but not „Mädchen“.
>> But still "Mädchen" seems to be derived from "Magd":
>> http://www.wissen.de/wortherkunft/maedchen
>
> Yes, Grimm agrees
> <http://woerterbuchnetz.de/cgi-bin/WBNetz/wbgui_py?sigle=DWB&mode=Vernetzung&lemid=GM00094#XGM00094>.
>
> It's a pity that Mark Twain did not know about "Mensch": "Der Mensch"
> (masculine) means "the human being". The old "das Mensch" (neuter)
> means "a female human being" and is still occasionally used in some
> areas of Germany. Plural: "Die Menscher" ;-)
>
Oddly enough, (and "mensch" is translated as "man" when used as a swear
word) the English word "Man" originally also meant "the human being". Eg
"mankind".
It had two ?Norse prefixes to add gender, Wer-Man and Wif-Man. The Wer
presumably got dropped (but survives in words like were-wolf), while
Wif-Man became Woman and, presumably, also Wife.
Cheers,
Wol
- Re: double time signature problem, (continued)
- Re: double time signature problem, Chris Yate, 2017/11/13
- Re: double time signature problem, David Wright, 2017/11/13
- Re: double time signature problem, David Kastrup, 2017/11/14
- Re: double time signature problem, Karlin High, 2017/11/14
- Re: double time signature problem, Wols Lists, 2017/11/14
- Re: double time signature problem, Blöchl Bernhard, 2017/11/14
- Re: double time signature problem, Simon Albrecht, 2017/11/14
- Re: double time signature problem, Noeck, 2017/11/14
- Re: double time signature problem, Werner Arnhold, 2017/11/15
- Re: double time signature problem, Knut Petersen, 2017/11/15
- Re: double time signature problem,
Wols Lists <=
- [OT] Grammatic gender, Simon Albrecht, 2017/11/14
- Re: [OT] Grammatic gender, Andrew Bernard, 2017/11/14
- Re: [OT] Grammatic gender, Jacques Menu Muzhic, 2017/11/15
- Re: [OT] Grammatic gender, Karlin High, 2017/11/15
- Re: [OT] Grammatic gender, Hilary Snaden, 2017/11/15
- Re: [OT] Grammatic gender, David Wright, 2017/11/15
- Re: [OT] Grammatic gender, Wols Lists, 2017/11/15
- Re: [OT] Grammatic gender, Urs Liska, 2017/11/15
- Re: [OT] Grammatic gender, J Martin Rushton, 2017/11/15
- Re: [OT] Grammatic gender, Blöchl Bernhard, 2017/11/15