[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Changing voice order...
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Changing voice order... |
Date: |
Fri, 28 Oct 2016 09:51:12 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
Dan Eble <address@hidden> writes:
> On Oct 27, 2016, at 09:54 , David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> << \context Voice = "1" \with \voiceThree ...
>> \context Voice = "2" \with \voiceOne ...
>> \context Voice = "3" \with \voiceTwo ...
>> \context Voice = "4" \with \voiceFour ...
>
> I’m not sure whether this thread has progressed beyond the need to
> mention this (forgive me if it has), but this is repulsive.
Well, it is actually more like
<< \context Voice = "1" \with \voiceOne ...
\context Voice = "2" \with \voiceThree ...
\context Voice = "3" \with \voiceFour ...
\context Voice = "4" \with \voiceTwo ... >>
because I misremembered the order. But I assume that your qualification
would still apply.
> I mean that in as friendly a way as possible.
Well, I did mention that I was also for retiring \voiceOne...\voiceFour.
My current proposal would be more like
<< \context Voice = "1" \with \voiceUp ...
\context Voice = "2" \with \inner \voiceUp ...
\context Voice = "3" \with \inner \voiceDown ...
\context Voice = "4" \with \voiceDown ... >>
At any rate, does that mean that you are fine with
<< \sopranoI \\ \alto \\ \sopranoII >>
and
<< \sopranoI \\ \altoII \\ \sopranoII \\ \altoI >>
because that is what we currently have?
--
David Kastrup
Re: Changing voice order..., Carl Sorensen, 2016/10/27
Re: Changing voice order..., lilypond, 2016/10/27
RE: Changing voice order..., Mark Stephen Mrotek, 2016/10/27