[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Augmentation dot positioning
From: |
Carl Sorensen |
Subject: |
Re: Augmentation dot positioning |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Sep 2016 13:26:57 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.6.7.160722 |
On 9/14/16 9:05 AM, "Chris Yate" <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>
>
>Attached with some extra cases I'd forgotten about (the inverted versions
>of the final 6.
According to Gould, I believe that dots limit 3 is the correct setting.
Case 1: Gould says that the dot in the A space is correct. The only dots
she removes are dots that are 2 staff spaces or more away from the chord
(p. 56); the A space is only one staff space away.
Case 2: Similarly, the B space dot is correct according to Gould.
Case 9: Just as in case 2, the B space dot is correct.
Case 10: The C space dot is correct according to Gould -- one staff space
above chord.
Case 12: See cases 2 and 9; B space dot is one staff space below chord
Case 13: I am unsure about the G dot -- it's one and a half staff spaces
below the chord, so by Gould's strict rule, it should be there, I guess.
But I prefer it gone.
Case 14: I'm not sure why you consider the A space dot unnecessary.
According to Gould's rules, it should be there.
Case 15: Same as case 14.
Case 16: As in cases 2 and 9, Gould suggests the B space dot belongs.
Case 17: Same as 16
Case 18: Same as 16
Case 19: Same as 16
Case 20: Gould's rules say A space dot is correct.
Case 21: Same as 20
Case 23: Same as 16
Case 24: Gould's rules say G space dot is correct.
Case 25: Gould's rules say B space dot is correct.
In short, dots limit 3 never fails according to Chris's rules, and appears
to me to be exactly correct with respect to Gould's rules. So I have a
hard time seeing what the issue is.
Thanks,
Carl
- Re: Augmentation dot positioning, (continued)
- Re: Augmentation dot positioning, Chris Yate, 2016/09/14
- Re: Augmentation dot positioning, Chris Yate, 2016/09/14
- Re: Augmentation dot positioning, Davide Liessi, 2016/09/14
- Re: Augmentation dot positioning, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/09/14
- Re: Augmentation dot positioning, Chris Yate, 2016/09/14
- Re: Augmentation dot positioning, Chris Yate, 2016/09/14
- Re: Augmentation dot positioning, Chris Yate, 2016/09/14
- Re: Augmentation dot positioning, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/09/14
- Re: Augmentation dot positioning, Chris Yate, 2016/09/14
- Re: Augmentation dot positioning, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/09/15
- Re: Augmentation dot positioning,
Carl Sorensen <=
- Message not available
- Re: Augmentation dot positioning, Chris Yate, 2016/09/15
- Re: Augmentation dot positioning, Chris Yate, 2016/09/15
- Re: Augmentation dot positioning, Carl Sorensen, 2016/09/15
- Re: Augmentation dot positioning, Carl Sorensen, 2016/09/15
- Re: Augmentation dot positioning, Chris Yate, 2016/09/15
- Re: Augmentation dot positioning, Carl Sorensen, 2016/09/15
- Re: Augmentation dot positioning, Chris Yate, 2016/09/15
- Re: Augmentation dot positioning, Chris Yate, 2016/09/15
- Re: Augmentation dot positioning, Carl Sorensen, 2016/09/15
- Re: Augmentation dot positioning, Chris Yate, 2016/09/15