Re: "unroll code"

[Gianmaria Lari]

Thank you to Robert Schmaus, Andrew Bernard, David Wright  for the
suggestions. 

I try to be more precise.
It's not that really I need to be able to enroll some lilypond code. 
(1) I was curios to know if LP or Frescobaldi give this functionality
(2) I thought that maybe this functionality was available because LP
compiler probably create a intermediate enrolled structure (substituting
variable with their contents, substituing function like "\traspose" with the
trasnposed music etc.). 
(3) I have written some lilypond music in a terrible way and I would be
curios to see it in a more linear way :)

I also thought that having the music enrolled would be the preliminary step
for the opposite process. Having an alghorithm that looks for repetition and
try to rewrite the music in a more more compacted way (using repetition,
transpose etc. etc.)

As you can understand this is very much a curiosity than a need. But I'm
expecially curious about (2).

The Robert idea: LP -> Midi -> LP is correct but I have some experience
going from Midi to LP and I always hope to be able to avoid it :) As Andrew
and David point out you need a lot of work after the conversion. In my
opinion this is to be considered possible only just in theory or for
simple/short music.
g.



--
View this message in context: 
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/unroll-code-tp190602p190618.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.